From January 2005 through 2015:

1. Rape rates fluctuated, but were generally lower by 2015 than they were in 2005.
2. Rape was most prevalent in neighborhoods historically beset by violent crime, including the North Side, Homewood and the Hill District.
3. Victims of rape were disproportionately young, African American and female.
4. Rape clearance rates were higher than those of comparable cities, but varied depending on method of assault, time of year and victim demographics.

Click here to view the full report. 

Click here to view an interactive visualization of crime in the city of Pittsburgh.

From January 2005 through July 2015:

1. Pittsburgh’s motor vehicle theft rate declined sharply and remained the lowest among comparable mid-sized cities.
2. Motor vehicle theft was most prevalent in Pittsburgh’s East End, North Shore and South Side.
3. Victims of motor vehicle theft were older than average crime victims and disproportionately African American and male.
4. Motor vehicle theft clearance rates were higher than those of comparable cities, but varied depending on the location of the theft and whether the theft was completed.

Click here to view the full report. 

Click here to view an interactive visualization of crime in the city of Pittsburgh.

From January 2005 through July 2015:

1. Drug violation rates decreased in the City of Pittsburgh, accompanied by reductions in adult and juvenile arrests.
2. As drug violations declined, marijuana made up a larger share of all drug offenses as compared to drugs in the opioid/cocaine category.
3. The highest drug violation rates were reported near Downtown Pittsburgh, the South Side Hilltop neighborhoods, the Southside Flats and the North Side.
4. Nearly all reported drug violations culminated in an arrest, with nearly 20 times as many adults arrested as juveniles.

Click here to view the full report. 

Click here to view an interactive visualization of crime in the city of Pittsburgh.

From January 2005 through July 2015:

1. Burglary rates in Pittsburgh were lower than in most comparable cities.
2. Burglary was most prevalent in Pittsburgh’s East End, North Side and South Side Hilltop neighborhoods.
3. Victims of burglary were disproportionately African American and tended to be older than victims of other Part 1 crimes.
4. Burglary clearance rates were higher than those of comparable cities, but varied depending on the method of entry, location and time of year.

Click here to view the full report.

Click here to view an interactive visualization of crime in the city of Pittsburgh.

From January 2005 through July 2015:

1. Arson rates increased in the City of Pittsburgh, contrary to trends observed in comparable cities.
2. Arson was most prevalent in the Homewood, North Side and South Side Hilltop neighborhoods of Pittsburgh.
3. Arson clearance rates were highest during the first months of the year and for arsons involving an occupied structure.

Click here to view the full report.

Click here to view an interactive visualization of crime in the city of Pittsburgh.

By the spring of 2015, 16 school districts, Propel Schools and the Allegheny Intermediate Unit had signed legal agreements with the Department of Human Services (DHS), allowing data to be shared on a level never before possible.

This publication describes the way in which DHS’s partnerships with local school districts continued to expand and enabled us to focus on specific issues, such as homelessness, greater collaboration between human services and school social workers, and faster and more through identification of students in need.

Click here to read the report.

Click here to read Improving Outcomes and Well Being: August 2013 Update.

In 2014, the Allegheny County Department of Human Services (DHS) conducted a review of its homelessness services system as a first step in planning for and promoting effective strategies for reducing homelessness. This report provides information about the population of families experiencing a housing crisis in Allegheny County from 2009 through 2013, with a particular focus on the 2009 entry cohort.

The vast majority of families had a female head of household, and females were over-represented by nearly 30 percent when compared to the general adult population of Allegheny County. African American–headed families accounted for 60 percent of families served over the five-year period, a rate nearly five times greater than that of the African American population in Allegheny County. While the number of family members accessing homelessness services increased by more than 400 adults and more than 500 children over the five-year period, the overall demographic characteristics of this population remained quite constant.

Click here to view the full report. 

Click here to view a related report about individuals involved in Allegheny County’s homelessness system. 

Analysis and content: Ryan Burger, Abigail Horn, Brian Bell and Erin Dalton

This report describes individuals who experienced a housing crisis in Allegheny County from 2009 through 2013, with a particular focus on the 2009 entry cohort.

Click here to read the full report. 

Click here to read a related report about families involved in Allegheny County’s homelessness system. 

Analysis and content: Ryan Burger, Abigail Horn, Brian Bell and Erin Dalton

The cost of out-of-home placements vary greatly, depending upon length, type of placement and level of care required.  Type of placement was a significant factor in cost variation; group home placements, at approximately four times the cost of kinship care, were the most expensive.  Cost increased with the child’s age at entry, although this may be attributed, in part, to the fact that older children were more likely to be placed in more expensive placement types. Placement in more expensive group settings may also be the reason why subsequent home removals were more costly than initial placements.

Click here to view the full report. 

Analysis and content: Kyle Jennison and Sarah Thurston

The Parents Raising Safe Kids curriculum was developed by the American Psychological Association and implemented nationally in an effort to teach positive parenting skills to parents and caregivers. Offered locally at 17 program sites throughout the County, the curriculum was found to improve parenting skills; media literacy; knowledge of child development; and parental attitude and behavior toward children.

Click here to view the full report.

Prepared by: Farhod Yuldashev, Brian Bell and Evelyn Whitehill

Unwieldy case backlogs and delays inspired a number of changes in how the Allegheny County Criminal Court processes cases.  By expediting plea offers, completing discovery and providing evidence at formal arraignments, and prioritizing clearing of old cases, the Court has realized a significant decrease in the number of active criminal cases. Other benefits of these changes include better adjudication of more serious cases, improved engagement by defense counsel and prosecutors, greater focus on problem-solving courts, and better management of jail overcrowding resulting from defendants awaiting trial for extended periods of time.

Click to read the full report. 

Schools districts and human service systems define homelessness differently (as mandated by their respective regulatory and funding entities), resulting in many youth who are known to only one system. While being homeless is a disruptive experience that often hurts educational achievement, homeless youth are afforded additional supports to counteract these impacts. This report examines the misalignment in the two homeless populations, examining the underlying reasons as well as the potential solutions that would allow both schools and the human services agency to support the larger homeless population.

Click to read the full data brief. 

Writer: Jeffery Fraser
Research and content: Sanjeev Baidyaroy, Emily Kulick and Erin Dalton

DHS conducted a review of Allegheny County’s services for homeless individuals and families, as part of a strategic plan to improve the quality, accessibility and comprehensiveness of the system; this report focuses on the client perspective of the system and includes a description of current system change activities as well as recommendations for further action.

Click here to read the full report.

Prepared by: Abigail Horn, Evelyn Whitehill and Michael Yonas, DrPH

Prepared by: Urban Institute

Click to read the full report.

Intensive supervision programs like school-based probation are increasingly viewed as a way to generate savings to society, by preventing or reducing the likelihood of crime, as well as to improve outcomes for the juvenile offenders through an emphasis on education and employment opportunities. Allegheny County examined a number of outcomes for Pittsburgh Public School students under school-based probation before, during and after supervision, including participation in social services, educational outcomes, and future involvement in the juvenile and criminal justice systems. Of the students in school-based probation, more than 70 percent improved attendance during supervision and over 40 percent improved their Grade Point Average (GPA).  Interestingly, for students charged with misdemeanors, those who recidivate have more than double the absence rate during supervision than those who do not re-offend.

Click to read the full report.

Prepared by: Kathryn Collins, Ph.D., Erin Dalton and Emily Kulick